This is one of most entitled and offensive pieces I've read from a Black author.

It presupposes that the purpose of Hollywood is not only to cater exclusively to the needs of the black community, but that all their choices for best film must revolve around you. Not only is that ignorant of every other disenfranchised group, (you realize that 10.4% of film nominees over the 14 year period preceeding the Oscars were Black which is about 1.4% percentage points of the Black population in America, compare that to Hispanic, South Asian, East Asian, or Native American populations). it's a highly inaccurate way to judge a film's merits and it's not even accurate.

It's one thing to diversify the voting body (I'm for that) and to even make rules for greater inclusion in the film process, but to campaign for restrictions on art when things don't go your way (the Oscar race does affect what kinds of films get greenlit and film makers are surely afraid of upsetting choices that aren't woke), but the #oscarssowhite contingent has launched spurious claims on 3 of the last 4 Oscar front-runners. as far as I'm concerned this is the age of the asterisk

https://orrinkonheim.medium.com/oscars-in-the-age-of-the-asterisk-5024f303ac53

Additionally, it hasn't occurred to you that perhaps Green Book is a better film? It challenges the viewer with uncomfortable dynamics and conversations whereas Black Klansman has nothing new to say other than racism existed. It's a fine action film, but it's nowhere near as ground breaking as School Daze or Do the Right Thing with complex characters and differing shades of activism within the black community.