"He admits that while in the prolife movement for nearly 20 years, he lived in a sort of fairy tale daze, thinking about the prolife movement in terms of white women who would be supported by their communities so they could keep their babies, while being completely blind to the unique challenges facing American women of color. He admits to raising millions of dollars that should have gone to mothers and children in need, as opposed to being spent on politics and politicians."

But that doesn't make as much sense as I was hoping it would make.

Are you sure this isn't an editorial comment on your part?

Either his revelation or your editorializing of his comments ignores the fact that poverty also hits certain White populations of the country like in Appalachia really hard. To suggest it's some blindness to racism is just false considering they all get screwed over by pregnancy equally, and women of color (Black and Hispanics) tend to have larger extended families that give the baby a larger safety net (although admittedly they're on average poorer).

Either way, this article appears to prevent a false narrative that understanding and fighting against racism will solely solve poverty.